Results matching “Bird”

Barbell Step-upBack in September 2006 I took a look at an exercise which doesn't seem to attract the attention it deserves - the barbell step-up. If you haven't tried it, it's definitely time to give it a go.

One further point before the article itself : despite the title, I perform both step-ups and squats (as do many Olympic weightlifters). In my opinion, they both deserve to be widely known.

The Step-up - a real squat alternative?

In the 1920s - particularly in the US - weight training began gaining favour with the public at large, and the Step-up began finding itself in various books and magazines. However, the back squat gradually started to dominate (largely due to the efforts of the German Henry 'Milo' Steinborn and Joseph Curtis Hise) and the Step-up was all but forgotten.

The Step-up seems to have been largely overlooked as a weight-bearing exercise for the thighs - primarily due to the dominance of the back squat. This article may just make you reconsider its use.

What is it?

The Step-up - as the name implies - is nothing more complex than stepping up onto an object, then stepping back down from it. Although it is an incredibly simple exercise, there are a few things to be aware of.

Factors to consider

Perhaps the most important of these is the height of the step. The basic exercise works the hips and thighs, and the step height adjusts things in favour of the quadriceps or hamstrings. A higher step works the hamstrings harder, a lower step targets the quads (1).

According to Anatoly Bondarchuk, the 'normal' or ideal step height (for those with perfectly balanced quad and hamstring strength) is such that when the leading leg has the foot flat on the step, and the corresponding thigh parallel to the ground, the trailing leg has the toes just touching the ground (but the heel elevated) (1). This will naturally vary from person to person, and the use of a weight plate is common to bridge small gaps (it's unlikely that your training partner will have exactly the same requirements as you).

In addition to the step height, speed and number of reps both play crucial roles in determining the effectiveness of this exercise (for your personal goals). The usual rules apply - in general the reps will be lower and the breaks longer when training for maximum strength, and the reps higher/breaks shorter for hypertrophy goals.

The starting/finishing distance of the feet from the step also makes a difference, with a larger gap emphasising the Gluteus Maximus and a smaller gap emphasizing quadriceps (2).

Muscles used

The target muscle group is usually the quadriceps, though the weighting of this can be adjusted by altering the step height and gap as indicated above. Other muscle groups involved are (2) :

Synergists

* Gluteus Maximus
* Adductor Magnus
* Soleus
* Gastrocnemius (Second Leg)

Dynamic Stabilizers

* Hamstrings
* Gastrocnemius (First Leg)

Stabilizers

* Erector Spinae
* Trapezius, Upper
* Trapezius, Middle
* Levator Scapulae
* Gluteus Medius
* Gluteus Minimus

Antagonist Stabilizers

* Rectus Abdominis
* Obliques

As you can see, this is well and truly a compound exercise, and targets similar muscle groups to the squat.

Variations

Bodyweight step-up
The simplest form is a bodyweight-only step-up onto anything of a reasonable height (usually something below knee height). The speed, number of reps and step height will all play roles in the effectiveness of this exercise for your goals. Because of this flexibility the step-up can be used as a warmup, conditioning or strength training exercise.

Dumbbell step-up
As per the bodyweight step-up, performed whilst holding a dumbbell in each hand.

Barbell step-up
As per the bodyweight step-up, performed whilst holding a barbell across the shoulders in the same manner as for a back squat.

Step-ups wearing a weight vest
As per the bodyweight step-up, performed whilst wearing a weight-vest (such as the V-Max).

Sri ChinmoyFormer East Bengalese marathon runner Sri Chinmoy (pictured) switched to weight-lifting in the mid 1980s (when he was in his 50s); setting a personal record for Step-ups done whilst wearing a 50lb weight vest by regularly performing 100 in 1996 (aged 65). Once again, the usual rules of rep ranges and breaks apply.

Inspired by Chinmoy's effort, the slightly more spritely Ashrita Furman (6) completed 2,574 step-ups (bodyweight only) onto a 15" bench in one hour, later that same year.

Performing the step-up

Although almost any form of step is suitable for bodyweight step-ups, a large flat surface will be increasingly necessary as the weight lifted climbs up. One solution - which enables a quick changing of height - is a Step-Up Bench Accessory, such as this one from Gill Athletics.

For bodyweight-only or dumbbell step-ups, the pins (of a power-rack) themselves are a quick and often handy step.

When using a weighted bar, begin with the same stance and bar position as for a back squat. As you step up onto the box/bench/step, keep the torso as erect as possible (try to keep the shoulders roughly over the hips throughout the movement). On descent, slightly bend the leg you're coming down on to (it'll reduce the shock and increase safety).

Comparisons to Squatting

I realise that powerlifters are not going to suddenly stop squatting in favour of performing weighted step-ups. However, there are a couple of benefits to the step-up which might favour their inclusion in your routines :

  • The weight used in a barbell (or heavy dumbbell) step-up is much less than that of a heavy squat performed by the same lifter (1). This difference alone greatly reduces the stress inflicted on the lower back.
  • The step-up eliminates the bounce which is sometimes used during a squat (particularly in the deep squatting favoured by bodybuilders and Olympic weightlifters). This lack of bounce reduces the impact to knees.

Working them in

Perhaps the most obvious way to incorporate them in your routines is to simply replace squats with step-ups. Realistically, though, there are a couple of things to consider :

  • Look at your current quad : hamstring strength ratio. Although theories differ as to the 'perfect' ratio, the figures suggest that the hamstring muscles should be approximately 60-80% as strong as the quadriceps muscles. Failure to maintain that ratio increases the risk of injury.

    The relative strengths of these two muscle groups are usually tested using two exercises you may or may not already be using in your workouts - Leg Curls and Leg Extensions.

    If the quads are much stronger than the hamstrings (according to the above tests), a higher step should be used. Conversely, if the hamstrings are found to be stronger, a lower box should be used.
  • What are your goals? Are they leaning more toward hypertrophy, mobility or absolute strength? Step-ups are effective in the same rep ranges as squats - whether you choose to use sets of 1 or 100.

    Leonid TaranenkoSuccess has been had by Russian (and later Bulgarian) Olympic weightlifters who included healthy doses of step-ups in their training. An excellent example of this is Bulgarian Leonid Taranenko, who successfully lifted 266 kg (586 lb) in the Clean and Jerk at the 1988 Olympics. This was after 4 years of intense Step-up training rather than the traditional employment of the back squat.

    The Bulgarian team used (and possibly still do) the pulse rate as the primary indicator of when to increase the weight. Following warm-ups and a bodyweight-only set of 8-10 reps, triples (with increasing weight) are used. Following each set a pulse rate of 162-180 bpm is expected, and the next set not started until this has reduced to 102-108.

Conclusion

Step-ups can be used in many ways, and are a great alternative to (not necessarily a replacement for) the back squat. Give them a try.

References

1. Bulgarian Leg Training Secrets
By Angel Spassov, Ph.D., D.Sc. and Terry Todd, Ph.D.
www.overspeedtraining.com/legsart.htm

2. ExRx
Barbell Step-up
www.exrx.net/WeightExercises/Quadriceps/BBStepUp.html

3. Sri Chinmoy
www.srichinmoyraces.org/nz/sri_chinmoy

4. Ashrita Furman
www.ashrita.com/records/all_records/

Elizabeth Ferris - Test articles

Elizabeth Ferris

British athlete Elizabeth Ferris diving her way to the podium at the 1960 Olympics.

Front squatMike Boyle's articles have a habit of encouraging a new viewpoint on things, and this article from September 2006 is no exception. Shortly afterwards I found myself thinking hard about the Front Squat; particularly the method of holding the bar.

Holding the bar in the Front Squat

If the latest Mike Boyle article on T-Nation has you considering the Front Squat, you may be mindful of just how awkward it can be to hold the bar. Like Zercher Squats, they're often overlooked simply due to the difficulty.

There are several ways to hold the bar for the Front Squat. If one method doesn't feel right, or your current flexibility or injury precludes it, try one of the others. It really is a great exercise.


Clean position
Front squatThis is generally considered the optimum position - if you have the option, do it this way.

Think of it simply as the top of a Hang Clean (a reverse barbell curl if you like). It will get a lot easier with practice.


Arms crossed
Dave DraperAnother common method is to cross the arms over the bar, holding the left side with the right hand and vice versa. If the abovementioned Clean method is out of the question for you, try this.

Note that the hands are only helping to stop the bar rolling about, rather than trying to support it.


Hands Clasped
Holger KutroffWhilst frowned upon by many purists, this technique is still used occasionally. Clasp your hands together and use them to push the bar onto your chest/front delts.


Log bar
Log barA much less common version (but intriguing nonetheless) is the Log Bar Front Squat. As you can see, a log bar prompts a vertical grip, which takes a similar amount of flexibility as the Clean grip.


Straps
Front Squat using strapsI noticed this yesterday in Mike Boyle's article Strong Athlete, Zero Injuries. It's an excellent idea, and well worth considering if you lack the flexibility required for the Clean.

JV Askem had a similar idea many years ago with two pairs of pliers.


Stingray
StingrayThe Stringray device is designed to counter the basic deficiencies of the crossed arms approach. The two pads help keep the bar aligned and stable, allowing the widest possible grip to be used. The Stingray also lifts the bar slightly, keeping the weight over the front delts whilst keeping it away from your throat.

If the Clean position is out due to lack of flexibility, the Stingray is well worth considering.


Front Squat Harness
Front Squat HarnessThe Front Squat Harness performs a similar role to the Stingray (making the Front Squat a little more comfortable); although in a very different way. Here the bar is held - again with reasonable stability - slightly further forward, and is held using a narrow hammer grip.

If it looks like a serious, large, strong device; it is. The original version was tested to over 600 lb, the current model exceeds that by a good margin.


Double kettlebells
Lauren BrooksGot two kettlebells? Try this. Remember to Clean them one at a time.


Goblet
Goblet squatThe Goblet Squat is often considered a separate exercise, however I've included it here for completeness. It can be performed either using a dumbbell as shown, or by grabbing a kettlebell 'by the horns'.


Hands free
Hands freeIf none of the different holds shown above appeal, there's always the 'hands free' method (thanks Kris for the video). Unconventional to say the least.

Want to see it in action?

Here's Iranian weightlifter Hossein Rezazadeh front squatting 280kg / 617 lb during training. Not bad at all.

Basque Pelota - Test articles

Pelota

Pelota (Spanish for 'ball') only enjoyed a single Olympic outing : the 1900 Summer Olympic Games in Paris.

WaterMost people seem to agree that drinking water is a good thing, and that it helps in many areas of health and fitness; from weight-loss to stress reduction. What seems to be less well defined - at least on the surface - is the advice to drink '8 glasses of water per day'.

Where exactly did this advice come from? Back in April 2006, I did a little digging.

8 cups per day

Most people are aware that the drinking of plenty of water is advisable, and anecdotal evidence suggests that more = better (up to a point). However, where did the current guideline of '8 cups per day' come from?

According to Valtin (i) the origin is probably the 1945 recommendation made by the Food and Nutrition Board of the US National Research Council. This stated :

A suitable allowance of water for adults is 2.5 liters daily in most instances. An ordinary standard for diverse persons is 1 milliliter for each calorie of food. Most of this quantity is contained in prepared foods.

The 2.5 litres was changed to 8 × 8 fluid ounce cups in later recommendations, but is otherwise unchanged.

A couple of things are worth noting about this information (which hasn't really changed in over 60 years). The first is the line 'An ordinary standard for diverse persons is 1 milliliter for each calorie of food'. This seems much more reasonable to me - tying water consumption to caloric intake - than simply drinking 2.5 litres of water. It would seem sensible that an athlete consuming 4,000 kCals per day would require a greater water consumption than one getting through 1,500 (for health reasons - we're not talking about preparing for bodybuilding competitions here).

The second is the part of the guideline which seems to have been overlooked in later versions - 'Most of this quantity is contained in prepared foods'. I wonder just how much diets have changed in 60 years.

Further observations - there appears to be a strong emphasis these days on 'pure' water consumption. Whilst I always make sure to drink a glass or two of water when also consuming alcohol, coffee or high-protein foods; the bulk of my non-food water consumption comes from green tea. This doesn't appear - at least in my case - to make any difference whatsoever.

i Valtin H. "Drink at least eight glasses of water a day." Really? Is there scientific evidence for "8×8"? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002;283:R993-R1004

Away for a week - Test articles

RelaxingSpring is definitely here, and it's the perfect time of year to go offline for a week and enjoy the Great Outdoors. Although there are no firm plans yet, that's exactly what I'll be doing. Until September 7, that is.

In the meantime, there'll still be plenty happening on this site. A few personal favourites from the site's archives will be making a reappearance - together with some minor edits as necessary; there'll also be a couple of articles coming up from a guest author or three. I hope you enjoy them.

See you in a week.

HIT - Camera Collection

HITFinally, a HIT. Good condition, with box and a roll of film. Love it.

HIT - tCamera Collection

HITFinally, a HIT. Good condition, with box and a roll of film. Love it.

Andrei Rybakou. Photo © Rob Macklem.Another great week here at Straight to the Bar. A few highlights :

The Incredible Hulk - Test articles

The Incredible Hulk

The incredible Lou Ferrigno. Photo via Bryan's Hulk Page.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460  

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 5.2.7